Brian Stansberry wrote:

Steve Ebersole wrote:

so JBC 3 needs this change anyway?  

Yes, if it wants to go in, say, JBoss AS 5.2.  Which I'm quite sure the JBC team wants, since they made a bunch of other more significant changes to ensure compatibility. This one's real trivial.

at which point it would be a total
drop-in replacement?

Yes. I just did a diff between head of trunk (which passes 100% w/ JBC 3.0.0.CR1 plugged in) and the hibernate-3.3.1.GA tag and the only differences are two places where the missing DefaultCacheFactory.getInstance() call was replaced.

I fixed this compatibility problem awhile ago, but it could have been after CR1 was tagged.

--
Jason T. Greene

JBoss, a division of Red Hat

_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev