Em 9/5/14, 8:47, Max Rydahl Andersen
escreveu:
so a few things:
in stacks.yml the id is 'redhat-techpreview-all-repository' and
in this patch it is 'jboss-products-ga-repo' but it is still
using the techpreview url (/techpreview/all).
Since the Archtypes were released, should I update the Stacks to `
jboss-product-repository` for those archtypes only ? Then I
update the patch for 'redhat-techpreview-all-repository' for the
next EAP 6.4 release ?
I can also see that earlyaccess is now enabled by
default on https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-eap-quickstarts/commit/35847933994901f2ff29e0de20de1845f7972708
is that expected ?
I don't know.
Anyways:
1) can we agree on aligning the id's ? (just so we are in sync)
Yeap. For sure! I'll update the patch file now for
to 'redhat-techpreview-all-repository' as I just said..
2) is it expected the id says 'ga' but the url is not that ?
Once that we change to '
redhat-techpreview-all-repository' it won't matter anymore.
For #1 we should look at updating that in stacks.yml so we add
it with the same id.
Before changing stacks.yml I want to be sure #2 was consistent
choice we wanted to make for that?
ps. we actually also add this repo as a plugin repository - not
sure if that matters for you?
I don't think it matters since the tests worked fine.
So that's my plan:
1 - Update the patch file to use
'redhat-techpreview-all-repository' as repo id instead of
'jboss-products-ga-repo'. It will be available for next EAP 6.4
Archtype release.
2 - Wait for your answer if we should update stacks.yaml repo to
'
jboss-products-ga-repo' for EAP 6.3 Archetypes only
Is that right ?
/max
_______________________________________________
jbossdeveloper mailing list
jbossdeveloper@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper