+1

Makes sense to me!

M

On Oct 9, 2015 4:15 PM, "Paul Gier" <pgier@redhat.com> wrote:

Hi Everyone,

I realized the ".0" is probably redundant in "javaee-7.0", since there
will never be a "javaee-7.1".  And the "7.0" sort of makes it seem like
we are referring to the EAP version in some of the BOM artifactIds such
as "jboss-javaee-7.0-eap".  I propose we change these artifactIds to use
"7" instead of "7.0".  So, for example:

jboss-javaee-7.0-eap -> jboss-javaee-7-eap

We haven't released eap 7.0 Alpha yet, so I think these current
artifactIds have not spread too far into the wild yet to cause much of a
problem.

The trickier case would be the javaee specs BOM
(org.jboss.spec:jboss-javaee-7.0) since this does already have some
official community releases in Nexus.  So we should probably just leave
this one as-is.

Thanks in advance for any feedback!
_______________________________________________
jbossdeveloper mailing list
jbossdeveloper@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper

_______________________________________________
jbossdeveloper mailing list
jbossdeveloper@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper