Comments in line for this email and your first one.

On 15 Aug 2014, at 14:01, Rafael Benevides <benevides@redhat.com> wrote:

Ref to the branches, I also think that we should do a cleanup removing

- 6.2.x-develop
- 6.3.x-develop

IMO: Correct, providing there are no micro releases of EAP 6.2 and EAP 6.3 planned.

- jdf-2.1.9.Final

branches (keeping the tags)

Btw,

There's also a kitchensink-angularjs and wildfly branches that were not
updated since last year.


Anyone has any objections on removing theses branches ?

Em 8/14/14, 16:04, Sande Gilda escreveu:
Rafael, that sounds great to me.

Paul, does this work for you?

On 08/14/2014 02:26 PM, Rafael Benevides wrote:
I think we should tag the 6.3 quickstarts, then keep the same 6.3.x
for EAP 6.3.1 and rename the 6.3.x-develop to 6.4.x-develop

6.3.x-develop -> rename to 6.4.x-develop
6.3.x -> keep it to EAP 6.3.1

This looks right to me too. See: https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-928619


That's what I think about it.


Em 8/14/14, 14:33, Sande Gilda escreveu:
Now that JBoss EAP 6.3 is GA, do we need to tag the quickstarts and
create new branches for EAP 6.3.1 and EAP 6.4? It's so seldom we do
this that I forget!




_______________________________________________
jbossdeveloper mailing list
jbossdeveloper@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper


Paul.

-- 
Paul Robinson
JBoss Developer Team Lead (www.jboss.org)

JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
Directors:Michael Cunningham (US), Charles Peters (US), Matt Parson (US), Paul Hickey (Ireland)