Max/Fred

Can you please review https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-997344 and confirm if those ids are ok. If not, do you mind to place the right information at the document?

Pete/Max,

Do you know if Fuse maven repository still valid ?


Thanks

On 10/31/14 11:56, Rafael Benevides wrote:
Hi all,

I was thinking about the implementation of the repository definition in pom.xml and I want to share my thoughts:

- Create a QSTools CHECKER to mark the lack of <repository /> as a guideline violation if MavenCentralChecker is disabled.
   - The violation message will instruct to use the new QSTools GOAL that will be created

- Create another QSTools GOAL to setup the repositories.
  - There will be a list of approved repositories and its IDs (redhat techpreview, earlyacess, jboss developer temporary, etc)
  - QSTools will remove all previous repositories from pom.xml and prompt which repositories should be added.
  - This will help Quickstarts and demos to be easily buildable from development and production branches and will also allow this list to be bulk updated to remove any previous development repository definition.

Please,

If you have any feedback on this, feel free to reply.

--

Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer
JBoss Developer
M: +55-61-9269-6576

Red Hat

Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at www.redhat.com

LinkedIn Youtube 


_______________________________________________
jbossdeveloper mailing list
jbossdeveloper@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper