Nick,

Just forked it and here is the log

eskimo@dgolovin-desktop:~/Projects/jbds/jbosstools-fork-submodules$ git submodule add  git@github.com:dgolovin/jbosstools-target-platforms.git jbosstools-target-platforms
Cloning into 'jbosstools-target-platforms'...
remote: Counting objects: 6773, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (2351/2351), done.
remote: Total 6773 (delta 3488), reused 6756 (delta 3471)
Receiving objects: 100% (6773/6773), 53.70 MiB | 974 KiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (3488/3488), done.

It is to much for such a small young repository?

for example jbosstools-jst with all its history more than twice less space.

eskimo@dgolovin-desktop:~/Temp$ git clone git@github.com:jbosstools/jbosstools-jst.git
Cloning into 'jbosstools-jst'...
X11 forwarding request failed on channel 0
remote: Counting objects: 37604, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (5442/5442), done.
remote: Total 37604 (delta 19647), reused 37454 (delta 19501)
Receiving objects: 100% (37604/37604), 23.94 MiB | 659 KiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (19647/19647), done.

Why do you keep master branch empty?
Are there some reasons to have branches named different from the actual versions?

Thanks
Denis




On 02/07/2013 11:39 AM, Nick Boldt wrote: