I think the proper workflow here is to
simply open the new server wizard and let the user fill out their
choices. There's no point in duplicating that workflow.
Currently it downloads in the background, and, when the download
is complete, unzips it, makes a runtime out of that folder, and
then makes a server out of it. It probably should unzip it, make a
new runtime out of that folder, and then open a new server wizard
with fewer pages (server type already chosen, so we don't need
that first page).
Runtimes have remained the same and have not changed. Only servers
have.
But yes, will need to investigate how to do it cleanly.
On 03/27/2014 02:00 AM, Martin Malina wrote:
On 26 Mar 2014, at 17:37, Len DiMaggio wrote:
Why not provide both options?
which two options are you referring to ?
I think Len refers to this snippet from my email:
"So perhaps we should consider which one should be used for
runtime detection in the future. Or even better perhaps to offer
both options for runtime detection?"
So once runtime detection finds the servers, you could choose
which mode to use before clicking OK to add them. But I’m not
sure if there’s a way to do it and avoid confusion for the user.
-Martin
I think the idea about locking the servers deployment
mode
is too strict in context runtime detection.
We need some way to change these - either allow same
flexibility as
before or have a "Recreate this server using same basic info
but in Profile X" instead.
/max
-- Len
----- Original Message -----
| From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <manderse@redhat.com>
| To: "Martin Malina" <mmalina@redhat.com>
| Cc: "Rob Stryker" <rstryker@redhat.com>,
"jbosstools-dev@lists.jboss.org
| jbosstools-dev" <jbosstools-dev@lists.jboss.org>
| Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 10:32:36 AM
| Subject: Re: [jbosstools-dev] New server profiles vs.
Runtime Detection
| I noticed this discrepancy too. Agree need to figure
this workflow out.
| /max (sent from my phone)
| On 26/03/2014, at 12.03, Martin Malina < mmalina@redhat.com > wrote:
| | Hi Rob,
|
| | I have a question. Now that we have more profiles for
servers ( JBIDE-16721
| | )
| | - one that prefers management operations and one that
does not - what
| | happens when you add a server using Runtime Detection?
I think it will
| | currently use the non-management option. In the past,
you could change the
| | server settings later to use management. But you say
that increasingly
| | there
| | will be differences between the two that can’t be
changed afterwards - one
| | example is the deployment tab in the server editor.
|
| | So perhaps we should consider which one should be used
for runtime
| | detection
| | in the future. Or even better perhaps to offer both
options for runtime
| | detection?
|
| | What do you think about this?
|
| | Thanks,
|
| | Martin
|
| | --
|
| | Martin Malina
|
| | JBoss QA Engineer
|
| | Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
|
| | Purkynova 99
|
| | 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
|
| | Tel.: +420 532 294 265
|
| | _______________________________________________
|
| | jbosstools-dev mailing list
|
| | jbosstools-dev@lists.jboss.org
|
| | https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
|
| _______________________________________________
| jbosstools-dev mailing list
| jbosstools-dev@lists.jboss.org
| https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
--
Len DiMaggio (ldimaggi@redhat.com)
JBoss by Red Hat
314 Littleton Road
Westford, MA 01886 USA
tel: 978.392.3179
cell: 781.472.9912
http://www.redhat.com
http://community.jboss.org/people/ldimaggio
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
--
Martin Malina
JBoss QA Engineer
Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
Purkynova 99
612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
Tel.:
+420 532 294 265