Great! I am in Paris for a jBPM training now but I will include this ASAP


From: marshall.jboss@gmail.com [mailto:marshall.jboss@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marshall Culpepper
Sent: dinsdag 19 september 2006 18:12
To: Koen Aers
Cc: Dev - JBoss IDE; jbosside-dev@lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [jbosside-dev] Re: jBPM Designer feature.xml needs to be updated

OK Koen.. I've uploaded a JAR to the repository under eclipse/releng/jbosside-releng-tasks.jar. This includes the CalculateFeatureDependenciesTask, and the antlib.xml is also included.

On 9/14/06, Koen Aers <koen.aers@jboss.com> wrote:
No I meant actually to CC jbosside-dev :-))


From: marshall.jboss@gmail.com [mailto:marshall.jboss@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marshall Culpepper
Sent: donderdag 14 september 2006 19:16
To: Dev - JBoss IDE
Subject: Fwd: [jbosside-dev] Re: jBPM Designer feature.xml needs to be updated

I think you meant to CC dev-jbosside on this one


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Koen Aers < koen.aers@jboss.com >
Date: Sep 14, 2006 6:59 AM
Subject: RE: [jbosside-dev] Re: jBPM Designer feature.xml needs to be updated
To: Marshall Culpepper <marshall.culpepper@jboss.com >

I am pretty much OK with doing things the way they should be done, no problem with that.
Btw, are you talking about the meeting when I was in India? I cannot remember discussing this, but this might be due to some kind of jetlag ;-). Anyway, we are in the process of releasing jBPM 3.2 alpha1 so the release has my number one attention at present. And as I mentioned earlier, the good way to reuse the tag that Marshall has written would be to bundle it in a library that resides in the repository to avoid duplication. Or am I wrong about this?
 
Regards,
Koen


From: marshall.jboss@gmail.com [mailto: marshall.jboss@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marshall Culpepper
Sent: woensdag 13 september 2006 22:31
To: Max Andersen
Cc: Koen Aers; jbosside-dev@lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [jbosside-dev] Re: jBPM Designer feature.xml needs to be updated

Yes, this is what we decided on our meeting.. we are moving all dependencies to be included the "right" way, and retrofitting the build system to calculate feature dependencies based on those entries, instead of counting on eclipse PDE to auto-bundle things that are listed as <plugin>.

On 9/13/06, Max Rydahl Andersen <max.andersen@jboss.com> wrote:
just to be clear:

Our old/current way of bundling things are *wrong* in context of
integrating with the rest of
the eclipse ecosystem. you should only have <plugin> for plugins that is
actually part of the plugin
everything else is <import> of either plugin's or feature's.



--
Marshall Culpepper
marshall.culpepper@jboss.com
JBossIDE Team Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat


--
Marshall Culpepper
marshall.culpepper@jboss.com
JBossIDE Team Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat



--
Marshall Culpepper
marshall.culpepper@jboss.com
JBossIDE Team Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat