> My guess as to the "why" question is that this hasn't been requested by > anyone before. Right now only jst.java and module facets use the > classpath provider facility, but the facility was designed so that any > facet could use it if it makes sense for that facet. I do not know the > design and implementation details of how JSF and JPA facets manage their > libraries, but I would suggest opening enhancement requests (one for JSF > and one for JPA) to continue this conversation and to figure out if this > change makes sense for these facets. Will do that - but just wondering what the intended behavior is; I would expect that facet's should be encouraged to do similar things when it comes to libraries....and the "Server provides libraries" option for these two would indicate they at least should let the runtime know about the changes. In any case: Is there a way for a runtime to know which facet's are being added to a project that it is connected to ? e.g. if I move a project from runtime/server A to runtime/server B the classpath should be updated - but that does not seem to happen. Should it not ? /max > - Konstantin > > > -----Original Message----- > From: wtp-dev-bounces(a)eclipse.org [mailto:wtp-dev-bounces@eclipse.org] > On Behalf Of Rob Stryker > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 2:57 PM > To: General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues. > Cc: jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Subject: Re: [wtp-dev] Facet's not asking runtime/server about libraries > -intentional or error ? > > The type of "alert" not being given by the JSF and JPA facets are > usually called by a line similar to the one below: > ClasspathHelper.addClasspathEntries(project, fv)); > > The line above alerts the runtime of the facet version's new inclusion > and is borrowed from the WebFacetInstallDelegate. > > I echo Max's query. Why don't the other facets such as JSF / JPA do the > same? > > > > Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I noticed today that when enabling JSF or JPA on projects neither of >> them consults the server/runtime about which jars that are relevant >> for it. >> >> dynamic web and the java facet does....why not jpa and jsf ? >> >> some runtimes could return an optimized set of jars if this were done >> instead of just returning *everything* .... >> >> I'm i missing something obvious ? >> >> what about JPA projects that won't be dynamic web apps ? >> >> /max >> _______________________________________________ >> wtp-dev mailing list >> wtp-dev(a)eclipse.org >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev > > _______________________________________________ > wtp-dev mailing list > wtp-dev(a)eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev > > Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may > contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and > affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, > copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the > use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not > the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, > please immediately return this by email and then delete it. > _______________________________________________ > wtp-dev mailing list > wtp-dev(a)eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev