Hi all, As of right now "Hybrid Mobile (Cordova) Tools" are still referred to as "Aerogear" on Jboss Tools website (http://tools.jboss.org/features/aerogear.html) and various other places (internal Red Hat documents). This is confusing, because the project has no Aerogear specific tooling and it is not developed by Aerogear team.

I propose that we use just "Hybrid Mobile Tools" or similar name when talking about branded Thym. What do you think? Is there any reason why to stick with the current name? --Petr _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev

The plan was to tool the bits coming in from aearogear. I think we are still doing that but that will be under FeeedHenry umbrella now. I am OK with changing the Aerogear to something like Mobile on the web site because it describes the product better. I guess we can add the FeedHenry things when they come under mobile at the web site. Aerogear is actually the name of the community project that builds software for mobile development. I do not think having the aerogear name on the jbosstool-aerogear repo, jira and the package names would hurt. So let's keep them as it is and only modify the website.

Gorkem On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > On 14 Nov 2014, at 12:07, Petr Stribny wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> As of right now "Hybrid Mobile (Cordova) Tools" are still referred >> to >> as "Aerogear" on Jboss Tools website >> (http://tools.jboss.org/features/aerogear.html) and various other >> places (internal Red Hat documents). >> >> This is confusing, because the project has no Aerogear specific >> tooling and it is not developed by Aerogear team. > > Gorkem is on the aerogear team. Aerogear is used in the > bundle/feature > names for aerogear specific stuff (like the examples). > > I'm not really much for renaming it, more like making it more > specific > and add a hybrid-mobile component (we can move the issues over if we > want to). > > Gorkem - any preference ? Earlier on there were plans about more > specific aerogear tools but that have not (yet) manifested itself. > > /max > > >> >> I propose that we use just "Hybrid Mobile Tools" or similar name >> when >> talking about branded Thym. >> >> What do you think? Is there any reason why to stick with the current >> name? >> >> --Petr >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >

On 17 Nov 2014, at 18:04, Gorkem Ercan <gorkem.ercan(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > On 17 Nov 2014, at 13:08, Gorkem Ercan wrote: > >> The plan was to tool the bits coming in from aearogear. I think we are >> still doing that but that will be under FeeedHenry umbrella now. >> I am OK with changing the Aerogear to something like Mobile on the web site >> because it describes the product better. I guess we can >> add the FeedHenry things when they come under mobile at the web site. >> >> Aerogear is actually the name of the community project that builds software >> for mobile development. I do not think having the aerogear name on >> the jbosstool-aerogear repo, jira and the package names would hurt. So >> let's keep them as it is and only modify the website. > > if we call it mobile everywhere but don't have matching jira component that would be a bad/confusing thing

> I would like to have a proper separate name for it if possible that can be used as component name too. > > Hybrid Mobile ? > > Aerogear Hybrid ? Problem solved, the current Jira component is already called aerogear-hybrid..

> > Any takes ? > > /max > > >> Gorkem >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> On 14 Nov 2014, at 12:07, Petr Stribny wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> As of right now "Hybrid Mobile (Cordova) Tools" are still referred to >>>> as "Aerogear" on Jboss Tools website >>>> (http://tools.jboss.org/features/aerogear.html) and various other >>>> places (internal Red Hat documents). >>>> >>>> This is confusing, because the project has no Aerogear specific >>>> tooling and it is not developed by Aerogear team. >>> >>> Gorkem is on the aerogear team. Aerogear is used in the bundle/feature >>> names for aerogear specific stuff (like the examples). >>> >>> I'm not really much for renaming it, more like making it more specific >>> and add a hybrid-mobile component (we can move the issues over if we >>> want to). >>> >>> Gorkem - any preference ? Earlier on there were plans about more >>> specific aerogear tools but that have not (yet) manifested itself. >>> >>> /max >>> >>> >>>> >>>> I propose that we use just "Hybrid Mobile Tools" or similar name when >>>> talking about branded Thym. >>>> >>>> What do you think? Is there any reason why to stick with the current >>>> name? >>>> >>>> --Petr >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>> >>> >>> /max >>> http://about.me/maxandersen >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen

Max, User-wise, the name Aerogear is mentioned only in links (on tools.jboss.org) where all links link to "Hybrid Mobile Tools". You won't find this "Aerogear" tooling nor "Aerogear" templates on detail page or in JBDS/JBoss Central. Everything is named "Hybrid Mobile Tools" and "Hybrid Mobile project". So perhaps it would be enough just to change text of these links. I believe that we should keep the name consistent.

--Petr ----- Original Message ----- From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <manderse(a)redhat.com&gt; To: "Gorkem Ercan" <gorkem.ercan(a)gmail.com&gt; Cc: "Petr Stribny" <pstribny(a)redhat.com&gt;, "jbosstools-dev jbosstools-dev" <jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; Sent: Tuesday, 18 November, 2014 12:18:18 AM Subject: Re: [jbosstools-dev] Aerogear name change proposal > On 17 Nov 2014, at 18:04, Gorkem Ercan <gorkem.ercan(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: > > >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen >> <manderse(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> On 17 Nov 2014, at 13:08, Gorkem Ercan wrote: >> >>> The plan was to tool the bits coming in from aearogear. I think we >>> are >>> still doing that but that will be under FeeedHenry umbrella now. >>> I am OK with changing the Aerogear to something like Mobile on the >>> web site >>> because it describes the product better. I guess we can >>> add the FeedHenry things when they come under mobile at the web >>> site. >>> >>> Aerogear is actually the name of the community project that builds >>> software >>> for mobile development. I do not think having the aerogear name on >>> the jbosstool-aerogear repo, jira and the package names would hurt. >>> So >>> let's keep them as it is and only modify the website. >> >> if we call it mobile everywhere but don't have matching jira >> component that would be a bad/confusing thing >> I would like to have a proper separate name for it if possible that >> can be used as component name too. >> >> Hybrid Mobile ? >> >> Aerogear Hybrid ? > > > Problem solved, the current Jira component is already called > aerogear-hybrid.. Okey. So nothing need to change ? Now I'm missing the reason for this thread ? :) Simple. /max