[INFO] Scanning for projects… and then nothing for a long while - 30-50 seconds pause in modules, minutes wait in root. This didn't happen before for me. Anyone else seeing this ?

Anyone know of a solution ? /max http://about.me/maxandersen _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev

Hi, I wanted to try run the full builds on trunk again now that we are on tycho 0.13 and i'm seeing massive delays in mvn startup. mvn clean install -B -Dmaven.test.skip on all the modules I've tried so far (forge, common, tests, jmx, …) starts up showing: [INFO] Scanning for projects… and then nothing for a long while - 30-50 seconds pause in modules, minutes wait in root. This didn't happen before for me. Anyone else seeing this ? Anyone know of a solution ? /max http://about.me/maxandersen _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev

I wonder if this is the reason: * For p2 repositories specified in the POM as repositories with layout=p2, the entire content of the p2 repository is added to the target platform. (This is effectively the same behaviour as before, but the concept of an "implicit target platform" no longer exists.) From: http://wiki.eclipse.org/Tycho/Release_Notes/0.13

----- Original Message ----- > On 10/28/2011 06:08 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >> [INFO] Scanning for projects… >> >> and then nothing for a long while - 30-50 seconds pause in modules, >> minutes wait in root. >> >> This didn't happen before for me. >> >> Anyone else seeing this ? > > I'm seeing it too. > > >> Anyone know of a solution ? >> >> /max >> http://about.me/maxandersen >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev

fyi: while preparing for my tycho talk at eclipse con I found out that this bug been in tycho since 0.11 (according to SAP Tycho guy) and is fixed in 0.14 (which i've verified) But for some reason I didn't see it show up before using 0.13… /max On Oct 29, 2011, at 23:41, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > On Oct 28, 2011, at 18:12, Rob Cernich wrote: > > >> I wonder if this is the reason: >> * For p2 repositories specified in the POM as repositories with layout=p2, the entire content of the p2 repository is added to the target platform. (This is effectively the same behaviour as before, but the concept of an "implicit target platform" no longer exists.) >> >> From: http://wiki.eclipse.org/Tycho/Release_Notes/0.13 >> > Yes, this is what I raised a while back when I saw the 0.13 release notes but when I asked if anyone saw delays at that time noone raised a hand. > > I'm at EclipseCon this week where the main guys behind Tycho also and i'll show them what we see. > Note, that overall build time *seems* to be faster on my machine, its just very annoying having to wait with no feedback….are you seeing the same here? > > Another one that annoys me is that I get stuff like this: > > [WARNING] The following locally built units have been used to resolve project dependencies: > [WARNING] org.jboss.tools.common.text.ext/3.3.0.v20111028-1322-Beta1 > [WARNING] org.jboss.tools.common/3.3.0.v20111028-1322-Beta1 > [WARNING] org.jboss.tools.common.model.ui/3.3.0.v20111028-1322-Beta1 > > because there are prebuilt binaries in my mvn repo - but that is the whole point so not sure why they are making such a noisy warning about this. > > Are you guys seeing that too ? > > /max > > >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >>> On 10/28/2011 06:08 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >>> >>>> [INFO] Scanning for projects… >>>> >>>> and then nothing for a long while - 30-50 seconds pause in modules, >>>> minutes wait in root. >>>> >>>> This didn't happen before for me. >>>> >>>> Anyone else seeing this ? >>>> >>> I'm seeing it too. >>> >>> >>> >>>> Anyone know of a solution ? >>>> >>>> /max >>>> http://about.me/maxandersen >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >> > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > > > > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > > /max http://about.me/maxandersen _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev

On Nov 3, 2011, at 09:36, Denis Golovin wrote: > It happened right after switching from 0.10.0 to 0.12.0, we didn't fix fix any issues by that, but build time increased twice. > Sorry I didn't hear any screams :( …and honestly when I move back to 0.12 its not as slow as 0.13…which is what caught me off guard. > The only good thing was changing groupId from sonatype to eclipse one and that lets us easy pick up new versions. > nono - it also fixed the use of UTC time for qualifier generation so the nightly hudson builds doesn't/shouldn't pollute you anymore plus it made handling of optional dependencies better so its more controllable by us and not just what p2 wants.

plus a few other things :) btw. if you got specific bugs reported or watched in tycho that you would like more feedback/progress on let me know - i'll be attending tycho talks/bofs most of eclipsecon and its the best place to make people aware of issues (and sometime learn that we did something wrong too ;)

/max > Denis > > On 11/03/2011 01:22 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > >> fyi: while preparing for my tycho talk at eclipse con I found out that this bug been in tycho since 0.11 (according to SAP Tycho guy) and is fixed in 0.14 (which i've verified) >> >> But for some reason I didn't see it show up before using 0.13… >> >> /max >> >> On Oct 29, 2011, at 23:41, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Oct 28, 2011, at 18:12, Rob Cernich wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> I wonder if this is the reason: >>>> * For p2 repositories specified in the POM as repositories with layout=p2, the entire content of the p2 repository is added to the target platform. (This is effectively the same behaviour as before, but the concept of an "implicit target platform" no longer exists.) >>>> >>>> From: http://wiki.eclipse.org/Tycho/Release_Notes/0.13 >>>> >>>> >>> Yes, this is what I raised a while back when I saw the 0.13 release notes but when I asked if anyone saw delays at that time noone raised a hand. >>> >>> I'm at EclipseCon this week where the main guys behind Tycho also and i'll show them what we see. >>> Note, that overall build time *seems* to be faster on my machine, its just very annoying having to wait with no feedback….are you seeing the same here? >>> >>> Another one that annoys me is that I get stuff like this: >>> >>> [WARNING] The following locally built units have been used to resolve project dependencies: >>> [WARNING] org.jboss.tools.common.text.ext/3.3.0.v20111028-1322-Beta1 >>> [WARNING] org.jboss.tools.common/3.3.0.v20111028-1322-Beta1 >>> [WARNING] org.jboss.tools.common.model.ui/3.3.0.v20111028-1322-Beta1 >>> >>> because there are prebuilt binaries in my mvn repo - but that is the whole point so not sure why they are making such a noisy warning about this. >>> >>> Are you guys seeing that too ? >>> >>> /max >>> >>> >>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 10/28/2011 06:08 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> [INFO] Scanning for projects… >>>>>> >>>>>> and then nothing for a long while - 30-50 seconds pause in modules, >>>>>> minutes wait in root. >>>>>> >>>>>> This didn't happen before for me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyone else seeing this ? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I'm seeing it too. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Anyone know of a solution ? >>>>>> >>>>>> /max >>>>>> http://about.me/maxandersen >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>>> >>>> >>> /max >>> http://about.me/maxandersen >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>> >>> >>> >>> >> /max >> http://about.me/maxandersen >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >> >> > /max http://about.me/maxandersen