8 p.m.
FYI
Tonight, I ...
* created JBIDE > foundation (Rob as owner)
* created JBDS > foundation (Rob as owner)
* created JBIDE > jst (Alexey as owner)
* created JBDS > jst (Alexey as owner)
* renamed JBIDE > common/jst/core to common (and updated description:
"Issues related to
https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-base/tree/master/common. For
jst issues, see jst component. For core, see foundation component")
(Alexey as owner)
* created JBDS > common (with description: "Issues related to
https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-base/tree/master/common. For
jst issues, see jst component. For core, see foundation component")
(Alexey as owner)
ref: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-23157
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com
1:36 a.m.
Hi,
Having "jst" separated makes things clearer IMHO.
However, I find a bit tricky to understand the distinction between
"foundation" and "common", and I also question the need to have a
distinction.
Cheers,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer for Red Hat Developers <http://developers.redhat.com>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
8:44 a.m.
They are historically two different components. Bit part of common is
our old and big XModel stuff. As far as I remember this was the main
reason why we created a new lightweight component to collect some basic
stuff with public API - foundation.
Thanks.
On 09/27/2016 10:36 PM, Mickael Istria wrote:
Hi,
Having "jst" separated makes things clearer IMHO.
However, I find a bit tricky to understand the distinction between
"foundation" and "common", and I also question the need to have a
distinction.
Cheers,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer for Red Hat Developers <http://developers.redhat.com>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
8:50 a.m.
Hi Alexey,
On 09/28/2016 02:44 PM, Alexey Kazakov wrote:
They are historically two different components. Bit part of common is
our old and big XModel stuff. As far as I remember this was the main
reason why we created a new lightweight component to collect some
basic stuff with public API - foundation.
Ok, so would it make sense to rename "common" to "XModel" by
the way?
Cheers,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer for Red Hat Developers <http://developers.redhat.com>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
12:17 p.m.
On 09/28/2016 05:50 AM, Mickael Istria wrote:
Hi Alexey,
On 09/28/2016 02:44 PM, Alexey Kazakov wrote:
>
> They are historically two different components. Bit part of common is
> our old and big XModel stuff. As far as I remember this was the main
> reason why we created a new lightweight component to collect some
> basic stuff with public API - foundation.
>
Ok, so would it make sense to rename "common" to "XModel" by the way?
It's not XModel only. It also contains other stuff like our validation
framework, java model stuff we widely used in cdk/jsf/etc and a lot of
utilities. Common and Foundation are just two different components owned
and maintained by different people. It's not optimal but this is how it
works now.
Cheers,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer for Red Hat Developers <http://developers.redhat.com>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
2765
days inactive
2765
days old
jbosstools-dev@lists.jboss.org
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Alexey Kazakov -
Mickael Istria -
Nick Boldt