JBDS SOA site includes com.jboss.jbds.bpel.feature, which in turn INCLUDES:
<includes id="org.eclipse.bpel.feature" version="1.0.1.v20120619-1916-H189-CI" match="compatible" /> <includes id="org.eclipse.bpel.common.feature" version="1.0.1.v20120619-1916-H189-CI" match="compatible" /> <includes id="org.eclipse.bpel.apache.ode.runtime.feature" version="1.0.1.v20120619-1916-H189-CI" match="compatible" />
and
<plugin id="org.jboss.tools.bpel.runtimes" download-size="49" install-size="93" version="0.8.0.v20120619-2251-H6-CR1-SOA" unpack="false" /> <plugin id="com.jboss.jbds.bpel.examples" download-size="2" install-size="2" version="1.0.0.v20120622-1559-H10-CR1-SOA" />
Whereas the JBT SOA site includes org.jboss.tools.bpel.feature, which in turn REQUIRES (not INCLUDES):
<import feature="org.eclipse.bpel.feature" version="1.0.0" match="compatible" /> <import feature="org.eclipse.bpel.common.feature" version="1.0.0" match="compatible" /> <import feature="org.eclipse.bpel.apache.ode.runtime.feature" version="1.0.0" match="compatible" />
and includes:
<plugin id="org.jboss.tools.bpel.runtimes" download-size="49" install-size="93" version="0.8.0.v20120619-2251-H6-CR1-SOA" unpack="false" />
My question is therefore, shouldn't both sites INCLUDE the Eclipse BPEL features, rather than simply DEPENDING on them?