I agree with Alejandro. All our scripts in jboss/bin also use the .sh extension.

We should stick to .sh

cheers
-thomas

Jason T. Greene wrote:
Ok I am mostly convinced, although ant doesn't use ".sh"

On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 23:32 -0600, Alejandro GuĂ­zar wrote:
  
Ant and countless other software uses .sh as well. When you see the .sh 
extension you immediately knows what the contents of the file are. The 
same does not apply to a file without extension.

I'd go for keeping .sh.

-Alejandro

Jason T. Greene wrote:
    
Hi Thomas,

I was planning on dropping the sh extension for JAX-WS tools. The reason
is so that the same command works for all platforms. This works since on
windows you don't need to type the .bat extension to execute the script.
However everything else in jboss uses .sh, and the old tools use .sh. So
perhaps it's bad to break convention.

How do you want to do this?

-Jason

_______________________________________________
jbossws-dev mailing list
jbossws-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossws-dev
      

_______________________________________________
jbossws-dev mailing list
jbossws-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossws-dev
  

-- 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thomas Diesler
Web Service Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx