Yep, but the interfaces in the pvm module <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/1/30 Heiko Braun <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:hbraun@redhat.com">hbraun@redhat.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
yes, that sounds reasonable to me.<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
<br>
<br>
On Jan 30, 2009, at 1:07 PM, Tom Baeyens wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
i don&#39;t know what&#39;s best. &nbsp;introduce 2 separate modules or include the spi interfaces in the pvm module. &nbsp;since it is an internal matter i would think it&#39;s best to put the SPI interfaces in the PVM module.<br>

</blockquote>
<br></div><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">
_______________________________________________<br>
jbpm-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:jbpm-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">jbpm-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbpm-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbpm-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>