To me, jBPM 5 looks a lot more like
Drools Flow than jBPM 4.x: for example, the vision includes WS-HT, integrated
rules/events, and apparently no support for jpdl. I think it’s a cool
vision but it really does make jBPM 4.x look like a dead end that I should
avoid. Am I reading the tea leaves wrong?
One suggestion is to go through the
jBPM 4.4 and 4.x issues and decide which go in the “Won’t fix” category.
Also, I’d like your opinion.
If I’m just starting out on a 12-18 month project, am I better off using Drools
Flow instead of jBPM 4.x? In which project will bugs get fixed and
features get added? Which project will make it easier to move to jBPM
5?
Thanks
Scott