On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Sebastian Schneider
<schneider@dvz.fh-aachen.de> wrote:
Hello Mauricio,
Am 17.04.2010 18:20, schrieb Mauricio Salatino:
> Hi Sebastian,
> Not sure about PVM, I think there are some differences with jBPM that
> need to be addressed.
> In drools flow there is already an advanced support for BPMN2, so it
> think we need to dig a little bit to find out big differences and
> missing points.
Does Drools Flow use a version of the PVM? Anyway, I never understood
completely what was the point of Drools Flow since in the first place
Drools is a business rules engine for me - and a good one - but not a
solution for the execution of complete processes.
I know that there are cases where a busines rule represents a kind of
flow and this is where Drools Flow fits in for me but I would never
consider task management part of it for example.
Just my 2 cents
Sebastian
--