Tiho, a question for you.. why guvnor cannot host a file? I mean.. I'm not sure how Porcelli is creating the war files for the services, but we can generate something similar right? some meta information, some images, some configuration files, etc, when the user or a client like eclipse want to get the workitemhandler installed it just create a zip file with all the required dependencies and it send that back to the client. In that way we will gain versioning, categorization and tagging for free..right? Plus the possibility in the future to manage that with a workflow for approvals if we add that for all the other resources.
Probably I'm missing something but I don't understand what is the Guvnor limitation to host files or descriptors, we are already doing that for spring beans configs.

Cheers


On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Tihomir Surdilovic <tsurdilo@redhat.com> wrote:
I'm not sure if Guvnor is the best place for it - because assets that are stored in Guvnor are not very portable as a "unit" outside of Guvnor. I would rather make it in a way work like maven -> users can specify the "parent" repository which can be one that we provide for the community with all out-of-the-box services nodes and run mvn clean install which will build their local repo that they can expose on any public domain or server they wish, any way they wish..just my 2c.



On 3/13/12 12:11 PM, Mauricio Salatino wrote:
At some point those definitions should be stored in guvnor right? Until now I think it's just a folder with some meta-data files to define what is in there, but I think that it really make sense to put that functionality inside guvnor that is a fully fledged repository right? 
Guvnor already provide the APIs to push resources, and we definitely need to add a kind of workflow for resources.. but it's not there yet.

Cheers

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Giovanni Marigi <gmarigi@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know the status of service task repository;
I really appreciate the idea behind it and delivering some POC, customers were really enthusiastic about this feature (especially its integration with jbpm designer and BRMS) but it seems that the actual repo doesn't have some new effort.
Will we provide API to push service tasks to the repository? I think it should be useful to provide some mechanism to approve a new service task before to make it public.

Thanks,
Giovanni

--
Giovanni Marigi
Red Hat - JBoss Consultant -
email: gmarigi@redhat.com
Mobile: +39 3423175986
Office: +39 0687502315

Red Hat Italy
Via Andrea Doria 41m
00192 Roma - Italy
www.redhat.com

Prima di stampare, pensa all'ambiente ** Think about the environment before printing
_______________________________________________
jbpm-dev mailing list
jbpm-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbpm-dev



--
 - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
 - Co-Founder @ http://www.jugargentina.org
 - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar
 
 - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -



_______________________________________________
jbpm-dev mailing list
jbpm-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbpm-dev




--
 - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
 - Co-Founder @ http://www.jugargentina.org
 - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar
 
 - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -