Hmm, the JIRA issue is also not accessible for me. What’s the problem here? Would be nice if somebody fix the permission problems…

You can make me owner of the simulation module, would make most sense I think…

Von: jbpm-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org [mailto:jbpm-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] Im Auftrag von Ronald van Kuijk
Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Juli 2008 17:39
An: Thomas Diesler
Cc: jbpm-dev@lists.jboss.org
Betreff: Re: [jbpm-dev] jBPM3 module ownership

Thomas, all,

JBPM-1403 is not accessible for me. That is not a real problem but never the less. I do have some comments though. The console and jbpm4jsf are so closely related that I think they should be owned by the same person. On the other hand the person that had knowledge of these is no longer part of the jBPM team. The BAM Console (which you(?) made a Jira entry for to be 'removed') was going to be based on Seam. I strongly suggest to declare the current console end-of-live and with jBPM 4 make a new console. If that is going to be based on Seam with JSF, you can make me an owner. If it is going to be something else (Flex, GWT) It'll be much harder for me.

Have a nice weekend.

Ronald

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Thomas Diesler <thomas.diesler@jboss.com> wrote:

Hi Tom/Team,

I am in the search of component owners for these modules in jBPM3. Every component should be owned by a living soul that I can talk to if there is an issue with that module.

console
distribution    (thomas)
enterprise
jbpm4jsf
jpdl/core
jpdl/db
jpdl/examples
jpdl/identity
jpdl/simulation
jpdl/userguide  (tom)
jpdl/ws         (heiko)

I filled in the owners for the modules that I know of. Please provide the missing information.

https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-1403

cheers
-thomas

--
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thomas Diesler
BPM Product Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
jbpm-dev mailing list
jbpm-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbpm-dev