To me, jBPM 5 looks a lot more like Drools Flow than jBPM
4.x: for example, the vision includes WS-HT, integrated rules/events, and apparently
no support for jpdl. I think it’s a cool vision but it really does
make jBPM 4.x look like a dead end that I should avoid. Am I reading the
tea leaves wrong?
One suggestion is to go through the jBPM 4.4 and 4.x issues
and decide which go in the “Won’t fix” category.
Also, I’d like your opinion. If I’m just
starting out on a 12-18 month project, am I better off using Drools Flow
instead of jBPM 4.x? In which project will bugs get fixed and features
get added? Which project will make it easier to move to jBPM 5?
Thanks
Scott