[JBoss JIRA] Resolved: (JBPM-655) node packaging and decoupling
by Thomas Diesler (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-655?page=all ]
Thomas Diesler resolved JBPM-655.
---------------------------------
Resolution: Out of Date
> node packaging and decoupling
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: JBPM-655
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-655
> Project: JBoss jBPM
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Core Engine
> Reporter: Tom Baeyens
> Assigned To: Koen Aers
>
> This task is to collect all the artifacts for implementing nodes in jBPM 4.
> * Node implementation class
> * XML parsing information
> * Node persistence:
> --- With a hibernate mapping file. In that case, we should scan all node packages somehow to find all the hibernate mapping files. Also this implies that it is not possible to have a common base schema for different languages such as jPDL and BPEL.
> --- Persisting node-specific configuration information in descriptors. We can have a generic set of mappings for persisting descriptor information. If the node specific configuration information is parsed to descriptors, it will always be storable. In that case, we just need add the sub class mapping and the type identifier.
> * Graphical information:
> --- icon
> --- form
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
16 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] Resolved: (JBPM-657) simple automatic node process
by Thomas Diesler (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-657?page=all ]
Thomas Diesler resolved JBPM-657.
---------------------------------
Resolution: Out of Date
> simple automatic node process
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: JBPM-657
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-657
> Project: JBoss jBPM
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Core Engine, Documentation
> Reporter: Tom Baeyens
> Assigned To: Tom Baeyens
>
> The first example should show a few automatic nodes. With automatic nodes, i mean nodes that have an action which does not result into a wait state. The idea is that the reader of this example should be able to see how a few pieces of java code are linked together into a process graph. Maybe a decision could be used as well.
> The process should be defined in a separate processdefinition.xml file.
> The tutorial should have a process file and a unit test. The unit test should have persistence.
> A readme.html and a build.xml should accompany the tutorial example. The readme should explain what is shown in the example and the relevance. The fact that persistence is of limited use here (because there are no wait states) should be explained.
> this example should NOT contain and process concurrency (forks and joins) and no more then 6 nodes (start and end states included).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
16 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] Resolved: (JBPM-591) Priority for Tokens or Priority propagation
by Thomas Diesler (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-591?page=all ]
Thomas Diesler resolved JBPM-591.
---------------------------------
Resolution: Out of Date
> Priority for Tokens or Priority propagation
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBPM-591
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-591
> Project: JBoss jBPM
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Core Engine
> Affects Versions: jBPM 3.1
> Reporter: Alexey Kakunin
> Assigned To: Tom Baeyens
>
> For current moment priority may be specified for Task (and as result will be assigned to TaskInstance).
> User may change priority of task instance... but... I think it is not enough.
> For example - we have process for processing ToDos. This process has different steps: specifying todo, assignment, processing, requesting additionalo information, results verification...
> We cannot say in process definition priority for this tasks - usually it is normal.
> But - it is much more improtant to be able to specify priority for the process instance - so, then we create new todo (and stating new process instance with new token) - specify priority of this process.
> Here I see different ways to implement it:
> * Priority Propagation - priority assigned to the task instance stored in token and then assigned to the all next tasks (in case then no any special priority is not specified in this task);
> * Priority may be assigned to the process (in this case we will have process priority - and priority of the task in this process);
> * Priority may be assigned to the token (and in split node we can assig different priorities to different subtokens);
> Of course it is possible implement by ourself by writting special actors and so on - thanks to the really high jBPM flexibility, but I think it is good feature for jBPM core
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
16 years, 7 months