April 2010 - jbpm-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBPM-2805) Add access to event type in EventListener interface

by Mike Martin (JIRA)

Add access to event type in EventListener interface --------------------------------------------------- Key: JBPM-2805 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2805 Project: jBPM Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Affects Versions: jBPM 4.x Reporter: Mike Martin Add the ability to determine the event type ("start" or "end") from within an EventListener implementation. There should also be the ability to easily determine the name of the process definition step where the event occurred. This makes it possible to write a single event listener that handles many different kinds of events. As far as design, it seems odd that the notify() method has a *Execution parameter, rather than an "event" parameter that contains all information about the event that occurred; the latter would be more in line with the way event listener interfaces are usually designed in Java. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

14 years, 4 months

4
10
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBPM-2706) Add subprocess with timers and wait state to test case suite

by Martin Porter (JIRA)

Add subprocess with timers and wait state to test case suite ------------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBPM-2706 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2706 Project: jBPM Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Runtime Engine Affects Versions: jBPM 4.x Reporter: Martin Porter Cleanup and add the attached test case for simple subprocess with custom java command exector and timeout loop for regression testing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

14 years, 4 months

2
2
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBPM-2405) make task forms i18n-able

by Tom Baeyens (JIRA)

make task forms i18n-able ------------------------- Key: JBPM-2405 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2405 Project: JBoss jBPM Issue Type: Task Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Console, Runtime Engine Reporter: Tom Baeyens Fix For: jBPM 4.x gert, can you try and see where we need to update the engine in order to accomodate this -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

14 years, 4 months

2
1
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBPM-2773) TaskService: allow search for assigned candidate tasks

by Kai WeingÃ¤rtner (JIRA)

TaskService: allow search for assigned candidate tasks ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBPM-2773 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2773 Project: jBPM Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Runtime Engine Affects Versions: jBPM 4.3 Environment: any Reporter: Kai WeingÃ¤rtner Fix For: jBPM 4.x I would like to be able to find all tasks a user is a candidate for, regardless of the task being assigned or not. Currently the TaskQuery.candidate - filter also sets the unassigned filter. Thus, already assigned candidate tasks can never be found. Possible use cases: - a task needs to be reassigned due to sickness of the assignee - user A needs to take user B's task, when a customer approaches user A about a task concerning him Solution: - don't add the unassigned filter in the candidate filter of TaskQuery but make them separate. To achieve the current result, one could set both filters explicitly. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

14 years, 4 months

2
5
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBPM-2814) Trouble using a custom BusinessCalendar because of 'new BusinessCalendarImpl' in BusinessDayCalendarBinding

by Per Christian Henden (JIRA)

Trouble using a custom BusinessCalendar because of 'new BusinessCalendarImpl' in BusinessDayCalendarBinding ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBPM-2814 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2814 Project: jBPM Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Reporter: Per Christian Henden Fix For: jBPM 4.x I've followed the howto on the JBPM webpages to replace BusinessCalendarImpl with my own implementation. My custom BusinessCalendar.add is called, that works, but in JBPM's BusinessDayCalendarBinding. java 'new BusinessCalendarImpl' is called and a BusinessCalendarImpl is used throughout the class. This choice results in a problem when setting the 'days' field based on parsing jbpm.business-calendar.cfg.xml. The field is written to the 'new BusinessCalendarImpl' and not to my custom BusinessCalendar. This means that in my custom BusinessCalendar implementation I have no access to that information ('days' is null). Other places in the JBPM code a processEngine.get(BusinessCalendar.class) is done to get an instance of the (custom) BusinessCalendar. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

14 years, 4 months

3
9
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBPM-2759) Make duedate accept subtractions with EL and business duration

by Ronald van Kuijk (JIRA)

Make duedate accept subtractions with EL and business duration --------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBPM-2759 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2759 Project: jBPM Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Affects Versions: jBPM 4.0, jBPM 4.1, jBPM 4.2, jBPM 4.3 Reporter: Ronald van Kuijk Priority: Minor Subtraction in combination with EL is not implemented. See JBPM-2745 (not was it in jBPM 3: JBPM-1776 so it is no regression) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

14 years, 4 months

3
10
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBPM-2813) Do not throw exception from BusinessCalendar when calculated end date ends up in the past

by Per Christian Henden (JIRA)

Do not throw exception from BusinessCalendar when calculated end date ends up in the past ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBPM-2813 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2813 Project: jBPM Issue Type: Patch Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Reporter: Per Christian Henden Fix For: jBPM 4.x The case where the subtract method is called with a duedate expression and reference date that resolves to a date in the past is handled by throwing a JbpmException ("duedate <date> ends in the past"). While this may sound like a good decision in theory, it is problematic in practice. As a user of the API it means I have two choices when calling the subtract method. I must either -resolve the calcuation myself- before calling the method, to avoid the exception, or I must catch the -generic- JbpmException and decide on a duedate myself not knowing what went wrong. When someone requests a date that is in the past in this way there's basically three options: 1) Let them have it. - This seems like a silly solution to me, duedates in the past doesn't make sense. 2) Throw an error. - In this case a specific exception should be thrown so that the user of the API can know why he got an exception. An alternative to today's solution is to throw a less generic exception, maybe 'DueDateIsInThePastException' or IllegalArgumentException. 3) Return the current date, i.e. return Clock.getTime(). - Optionally a warning that the date was overriden to not be in the past can be logged, but this seems unecessary to me. Attached patch implements alternative #3 (against trunk/revision 6208), which I believe is the best choice. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

14 years, 4 months

2
2
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBPM-2585) review / cleanup ExpressionEvaluatorDescriptor

by Tom Baeyens (JIRA)

review / cleanup ExpressionEvaluatorDescriptor ---------------------------------------------- Key: JBPM-2585 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2585 Project: jBPM Issue Type: Task Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Reporter: Tom Baeyens Assignee: Tom Baeyens Fix For: jBPM 4.2 see if it can be removed or make a jira issue to remove it in one of the next versions -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

14 years, 4 months

4
7
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBPM-2854) If exception handlers are defined in multiple nodes, only the first one is triggered during one execution

by Toshiya Kobayashi (JIRA)

If exception handlers are defined in multiple nodes, only the first one is triggered during one execution --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBPM-2854 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2854 Project: jBPM Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Runtime Engine Affects Versions: jBPM 3.2.8 Reporter: Toshiya Kobayashi If you run a process definition below with ExceptionActionHandler which throws IllegalArgumentException, the first exception will be handled by the first exception handler and the second exception won't be handled --- will be thrown as a DelegationException to the client. This behavior was introduced by JBPM-1887 to avoid infinite loop. But ExecutionContext.exception can be cleared after handling the exception. Then avoiding loop and using multiple exception handlers will be achieved at a time. ============== <process-definition xmlns="urn:jbpm.org:jpdl-3.2" name="sample"> <start-state name="start-state1"> <transition to="node1"></transition> </start-state> <node name="node1"> <event type="node-enter"> <script> System.out.println("node1 called."); </script> <action class="com.test.action.ExceptionActionHandler"></action> </event> <exception-handler exception-class="java.lang.IllegalArgumentException"> <script> System.out.println("node1 Exception Handler OK."); </script> </exception-handler> <transition to="node2"></transition> </node> <node name="node2"> <event type="node-enter"> <script> System.out.println("node2 called."); </script> <action class="com.test.action.ExceptionActionHandler"></action> </event> <exception-handler exception-class="java.lang.IllegalArgumentException"> <script> System.out.println("node2 Exception Handler OK."); </script> </exception-handler> <transition to="end-state1"></transition> </node> <end-state name="end-state1"></end-state> </process-definition> -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

14 years, 4 months

2
5
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBPM-2753) Simplify map specification in jPDL for simple case

by M M (JIRA)

Simplify map specification in jPDL for simple case -------------------------------------------------- Key: JBPM-2753 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2753 Project: jBPM Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Affects Versions: jBPM 4.2 Reporter: M M Allow simpler specification of maps in the case where both the key and value are strings, by allowing key and value to be specified as attributes of the <entry> element, instead of as child elements. This will greatly reduce the verbosity of the XML for this common case. The following <custom class="com.company.CustomActivity" name="some_step"> <property name="inputs"> <map> <entry> <key> <string value="input_file_a" /> </key> <value><string value="some_filename" /></value> </entry> <entry> <key> <string value="another_input" /> </key> <value><string value="1234" /></value> </entry> </map> </property> <transition to="next_thing"/> </custom> would become simpler, as <custom class="com.company.CustomActivity" name="some_step"> <property name="inputs"> <map> <entry key="input_file_a" value="some_filename" /> <entry key="another_input" value="1234" /> </map> </property> <transition to="next_thing"/> </custom> -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

14 years, 4 months

2
2
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

jbpm-issues April 2010