[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-1724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug...
]
Tom Baeyens commented on JBPM-1724:
-----------------------------------
What will we do with SEAM support in general ? It's going to be hard to avoid.
If we do support SEAM, how will the test suite look like. Should the jPDL/pageflow tests
be in jBPM or should they be in SEAM ? Thinking of it, probably pageflow should move to
seam as that is hard for us to test cause it (the page node) has a direct dependency on
SEAM iirc.
Apart from that there is the timer transaction problem: JBPM-1166
Fix or Remove SeamPageFlowTest
------------------------------
Key: JBPM-1724
URL:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-1724
Project: JBoss jBPM
Issue Type: Sub-task
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Reporter: Thomas Diesler
Fix For: jBPM 3.3.0 GA
org.jbpm.jpdl.JpdlException: [[ERROR] couldn't parse process definition]
at org.jbpm.jpdl.xml.JpdlXmlReader.readProcessDefinition(JpdlXmlReader.java:170)
at org.jbpm.graph.def.ProcessDefinition.parseXmlString(ProcessDefinition.java:152)
at org.jbpm.seam.SeamPageFlowTest.testPageFlow(SeamPageFlowTest.java:99)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira