[jbpm-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBPM-2830) (BPMN) In Latest source jbpm uses the name instead of the id for processes
[
https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBPM-2830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
]
Huisheng Xu commented on JBPM-2830:
-----------------------------------
Now, in jBPM-4.4, BPMN use id for the name of process definition. If there is no id, it
will throw a deployment exception. And it use name for the key of process definition.
Shall we use name for the description of process definition? and just let the key of
process definition always empty?
(BPMN) In Latest source jbpm uses the name instead of the id for
processes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBPM-2830
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBPM-2830
Project: jBPM
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Reporter: Sebastian Rühl
Fix For: jBPM 4.x
In Latest source jbpm uses the name instead of the id for processes...
In my opinion this is the wrong behaviour as the name of a process will be converted to a
id.
So if you want to start a process via:
executionService.startProcessInstanceByKey("process4711") it will throw a
exception.
Example Process for this:
<process id="process4711" name="Could be a very long description and
is not used to IDENTIFY">
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira