2:48 a.m.
[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug...
]
Tom Baeyens updated JBPM-2020:
------------------------------
Description:
As a subclass of JobImpl, TimerImpl will be save to the table of JBPM_JOB ,according to
the jbpm.pvm.job.hbm.xml.
However ,there is a one-to-many between TimeImpl and ExecutionImpl, so ,hibernate will
know that the ExecutionImpl's timers will be associate to the EXECUTION_ field of
JBPM_JOB.
If there is a many-to-many mapping, the table of <set> will be necessary, in this
case ,it acts as a association of JBPM_JOB and JBPM_EXECUTION.
table="JBPM_TIMER" must be not necessary. when setting
hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto=" create-drop", there no table named JBPM_TIMER be
created.
So I think you maybe wrong here.
Best wishes!
-----Original Message-----
i think it is must be there.
regards, tom.
aximo.yang wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am look the the codes of jbpm4 alpha1 and find that there is unheeding
> mistake in jbpm.pvm.execution.hbm.xml:
>
> < property name = / "hasTimers" / column = / "HASTIMERS_" /
/>
>
> < set name = / "timers" /
>
> cascade = / "all-delete-orphan" /
>
> table=/"JBPM_TIMER"/>
>
> < key foreign-key = / "FK_TMR_EXECUTION" / >
>
> < column name = / "EXECUTION_" / />
>
> </ key >
>
> < one-to-many class = / "org.jbpm.pvm.internal.job.TimerImpl" /
/>
>
> </ set >
>
> The table doesn't assigned ? for the Hibernate will ignore it ,so there
> will be not mistake, but make someboby wondering.you can just delete it
> ,is right?
was:
As a subclass of JobImpl, TimerImpl will be save to the table of JBPM_JOB ,according to
the jbpm.pvm.job.hbm.xml.
However ,there is a one-to-many between TimeImpl and ExecutionImpl, so ,hibernate will
know that the ExecutionImpl's timers will be associate to the EXECUTION_ field of
JBPM_JOB.
If there is a many-to-many mapping, the table of <set> will be necessary, in this
case ,it acts as a association of JBPM_JOB and JBPM_EXECUTION.
table="JBPM_TIMER" must be not necessary. when setting
hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto=" create-drop", there no table named JBPM_TIMER be
created.
So I think you maybe wrong here.
Best wishes!
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Baeyens [mailto:tbaeyens@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 4:01 PM
To: aximo.yang
Subject: Re: jbpm4 hibernate mapping file seem not current
i think it is must be there.
regards, tom.
aximo.yang wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am look the the codes of jbpm4 alpha1 and find that there is unheeding
> mistake in jbpm.pvm.execution.hbm.xml:
>
> < property name = / "hasTimers" / column = / "HASTIMERS_" /
/>
>
> < set name = / "timers" /
>
> cascade = / "all-delete-orphan" /
>
> table=/"JBPM_TIMER"/>
>
> < key foreign-key = / "FK_TMR_EXECUTION" / >
>
> < column name = / "EXECUTION_" / />
>
> </ key >
>
> < one-to-many class = / "org.jbpm.pvm.internal.job.TimerImpl" /
/>
>
> </ set >
>
> The table doesn't assigned ? for the Hibernate will ignore it ,so there
> will be not mistake, but make someboby wondering.you can just delete it
> ,is right?
> >
fix timer mapping
-----------------
Key: JBPM-2020
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2020
Project: JBoss jBPM
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Reporter: Tom Baeyens
Assignee: Tom Baeyens
Priority: Minor
Fix For: jBPM 4.0.0 Alpha2
As a subclass of JobImpl, TimerImpl will be save to the table of JBPM_JOB ,according to
the jbpm.pvm.job.hbm.xml.
However ,there is a one-to-many between TimeImpl and ExecutionImpl, so ,hibernate will
know that the ExecutionImpl's timers will be associate to the EXECUTION_ field of
JBPM_JOB.
If there is a many-to-many mapping, the table of <set> will be necessary, in this
case ,it acts as a association of JBPM_JOB and JBPM_EXECUTION.
table="JBPM_TIMER" must be not necessary. when setting
hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto=" create-drop", there no table named JBPM_TIMER be
created.
So I think you maybe wrong here.
Best wishes!
-----Original Message-----
i think it is must be there.
regards, tom.
aximo.yang wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am look the the codes of jbpm4 alpha1 and find that there is unheeding
> > mistake in jbpm.pvm.execution.hbm.xml:
> >
> > < property name = / "hasTimers" / column = /
"HASTIMERS_" / />
> >
> > < set name = / "timers" /
> >
> > cascade = / "all-delete-orphan" /
> >
> > table=/"JBPM_TIMER"/>
> >
> > < key foreign-key = / "FK_TMR_EXECUTION" / >
> >
> > < column name = / "EXECUTION_" / />
> >
> > </ key >
> >
> > < one-to-many class = /
"org.jbpm.pvm.internal.job.TimerImpl" / />
> >
> > </ set >
> >
> > The table doesn't assigned ? for the Hibernate will ignore it ,so there
> > will be not mistake, but make someboby wondering.you can just delete it
> > ,is right?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira