[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug...
]
Sebastian Schneider commented on JBPM-2006:
-------------------------------------------
I have a question regarding the integration approach. I don't have much experience in
relation to rule engines but there is JSR 94: Java Rule Engine API. AFAIK as of version
2.0 Drools is a fully JSR94-compliant rule engine. Maybe we should take this as an
integration approach and thus not aime for Drools integration or support but for support
for JSR94-compliant java rule engines? What do you think about this?
drools integration
------------------
Key: JBPM-2006
URL:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2006
Project: jBPM
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Reporter: Tom Baeyens
Assignee: Tom Baeyens
Priority: Minor
Fix For: jBPM 4.3
1) deployment:
- deploy rules in source format as part of the business archive
- add a rule deployer to the deployer manager. that will scan for all rules in
sourceformat and compile them into a rulebase. the rulebase & working memory are
deployed objects in the deployment.
2) rules based exclusive condition evaluation
3) decision table activity. maybe this is easier to implement directly instead of using
rules.
Later:
* configurable process variables to submit as facts
* investigate logging integration
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira