Here are the issues I could dig out related to this:

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWITCHYARD-1701 - hardcoding of
jboss.org repo in generated pom.xml (fixed)
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWITCHYARD-1824 - integrate with JBoss
Integration BOM (fixed - in November)

Those two I thought was done and thus should be working - but maybe the
BOM's changed or the plugin has not been updated or something ?

My understanding is that there is no BOM for FSW/SwitchYard.

Rob - do you know what the status is for SY project wizard to be BOM and
maven.enterprise.redhat.com friendly ?
My understanding from previous questions on this was that it already was
in place or being worked on.

I don't think it's unfriendly.  It simply adds SwitchYard dependencies to the user's pom.  It's up to the user to have their repositories configured correctly so the dependencies can be resolved.  In this case, it looks like a transitive dependency is missing from the configured repositories.

I can see you already responded on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079463 but seems like it
boils down to borked
maven dependencies ? (i.e. the wizard actually targets a BOM but the
repo does not work with it)

That was how it looked to me.  Something in the dependency chain requires that GAV, but it isn't available from any of the repositories, which is why I redirected the issue to the build guys.

/max

Agreed. As a separate topic, we do need to sort out BOMs for FSW, but
that won’t make them get magically used :-D

On 22 Mar 2014, at 04:32, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse@redhat.com>
wrote:

Maybe I'm missing something but this issue is not about missing a
place to host boms is it ? but hat the switchyard project wizard is
not creating the projects with a proper Pom.xml.

I thought this was done a while ago since I reported similar issue
before the New Years. I'll need to dig that one out when I get back
to laptop.

Lete know if I'm missing something.

Julian have you talked with rob Cernich about it yet ?

/max (sent from my phone)

On 21/03/2014, at 22.05, Rafael Benevides <benevides@redhat.com>
wrote:

We can build it together.

As long as Pete Muir approves it, I can create a new repo on github
https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-fsw-boms to host

org.jboss.bom.fsw:jboss-javaee-6.0-with-switchyard:switchyard-version>.

I can put a skeleton there, so you can adjust swithchyward BOMs as
needed (managed dependencies GAVs).

Please, let me know if this works for you.

Thanks

Em 21/03/14 13:05, Julian Coleman escreveu:

Hi,

What's the process for adding the developer BOM's to JBDS?  Looking
at:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079463

the reason that it happens is that the project is created without
the BOM
to version manage the transitive dependencies.  This will be a
requirement
for future platform builds because the POM transitive list might
not be
shipped in the maven repository - only the BOM's will have the
correct list.

So, we need to make sure that a (e.g.) SwitchYard project starts
with the
(e.g.) jboss-javaee-6.0-with-switchyard BOM, otherwise it's not
going to
build.

Thanks,

J

_______________________________________________
jdf-dev mailing list
jdf-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev

_______________________________________________
jdf-dev mailing list
jdf-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev

/max
http://about.me/maxandersen