Exactly why I like Jason's proposal of using the JDF logo explicitly.
On 2012-07-10, at 11:07 AM, Pete Muir wrote:Well we want to rate them based on their level of affiliation, not on their quality or difficulty.On 10 Jul 2012, at 16:04, Marius Bogoevici wrote:Something based on the JDF logo would be better. I don't think we want to *rate* examples, we just want to indicate their degree of affiliation with jdf.On 2012-07-10, at 10:25 AM, Jason Porter wrote:What about rendering the jdf "logo" as a stamp? with some specs on it or ink areas missing?----- Original Message -----From: "Pete Muir" <pmuir@redhat.com>To: "Jonathan Fuerth" <jfuerth@redhat.com>Cc: jdf-dev@lists.jboss.orgSent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 7:53:37 AMSubject: Re: [jdf-dev] Looking for a (visual) metaphorThat could work.I'll see if I can do some mockups.On 10 Jul 2012, at 14:50, Jonathan Fuerth wrote:A gold starburst "Official Supported JBoss Demo" would convey thisidea to me. Kind of like the Nintendo Seal of Quality.As for the lesser-supported scenarios, I'm not sure we need a markfor that. The absence of the official seal might be enough.Or, if the supported demos get an Official Seal, maybe thein-the-works demos could get the industrious Soon-to-be-officialBeaver of Quality, and the unsupported demos could get thecompletely unofficial Otter of Quality. (ha, ha, ha.. OK, I'llstop now.)-Jonathan----- Original Message -----From: "Pete Muir" <pmuir@redhat.com>To: jdf-dev@lists.jboss.orgSent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 7:08:45 AMSubject: [jdf-dev] Looking for a (visual) metaphorAll,We need a visual metaphor that quickly conveys to people that anexample is:* official, and something we will stand by, answer questions on,support in a product (e.g. TicketMonster)* something that we plan to add to as an official example later on(e.g. jbossworld keynote 2012)* something that is really interesting, but is unlikely to beofficial (e.g. Vineet's example)We had thought about using ski run colours (green circle, bluesquare, black diamond) to indicate the level, but they reallyrefer more to difficulty than to recommendation. Anyone got anygood ideas?Pete_______________________________________________jdf-dev mailing listjdf-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev_______________________________________________jdf-dev mailing listjdf-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev_______________________________________________jdf-dev mailing listjdf-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev