I have no problem with this. It'll probably make them easier for people to find.

----- Original Message -----

From: "Pete Muir" <pmuir@redhat.com>
To: jdf-dev@lists.jboss.org
Cc: "Joshua Wilson" <jowilson@redhat.com>
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 8:35:46 AM
Subject: [jdf-dev] Fwd: Changing the name of the Spring Quickstarts

Forwarding to jdf-dev@lists.jboss.org

Begin forwarded message:




From: Joshua Wilson < jowilson@redhat.com >
Subject: Changing the name of the Spring Quickstarts
Date: 13 January 2014 15:33:54 GMT
To: "'Pete Muir'" < pmuir@redhat.com >, < sme-jdf@redhat.com >
Cc: "'Burr Sutter'" < bsutter@redhat.com >, "'Vineet Reynolds Pereira'" <
vpereira@redhat.com >



Does anyone have any concerns or issues with changing the names of all the
Spring Quickstarts to start with ‘Spring-‘? Most notably this will affect
the kitchensink ones as it take any kitchensink spring quickstarts out of
the order of the rest of them.

I am purposing the following:

kitchensink-spring-basic -> spring-kitchensink-basic

My thought is that it would help anyone looking for spring related
quickstarts better able to find them. My concern is that I am not entirely
sure it is worth it to interrupt the flow/order of the list.

What do you all think?
--
Joshua Wilson
Senior Software Engineer
Jboss by Red Hat
Mobile: 843-727-5277
josh@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com


_______________________________________________
jdf-dev mailing list
jdf-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev

_______________________________________________
jdf-dev mailing list
jdf-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev