Sure, I responded to that forum thread that we should start a wiki page listing the standard ManangedComponent names and their ComponentTypes, and we can start updating the ComponentType based on that.

-------- Original Message --------

Subject:	[JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBAS-6676) Suport for exposing JMX bean as ManagedObject
Date:	Wed, 1 Apr 2009 16:17:22 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Ian Springer (JIRA) <jira-events@lists.jboss.org>
To:	scott.stark@jboss.org

    [ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-6676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12460101#action_12460101 ] 

Ian Springer commented on JBAS-6676:
------------------------------------

As I mentioned in my forum post, there is a similar issue where the {type=MCBean, subtype=*} ComponentType is used to represent multiple types of underlying managed resources - ServerInfo, etc. From the Jopr perspective, we'd much rather see a different ComponentType used for each different type of underlying entity. Is this feasible?