From edward.burns at oracle.com Sat Nov 6 00:20:06 2010 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6535921948348142298==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ed Burns To: jsr-314-open-mirror at lists.jboss.org Subject: Re: [jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] ANNOUNCE: JSF 2.1 Spec, Release Candidate Five Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 21:19:42 -0700 Message-ID: <19668.55134.867485.825721@gargle.gargle.HOWL> In-Reply-To: Re: [jsr-314-open] ANNOUNCE: JSF 2.1 Spec, Release Candidate Five on 5 November 2010 --===============6535921948348142298== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 14:53:48 -0400, Andy Schwartz said: AS> On 11/5/10 2:32 PM, Ed Burns wrote: >>>>>>> On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:33:29 -0700, Ed Burns said: >>>>>>> = >> = >> The unprefixed namespace, also known as the root namespace, must be >> passed through without modification or check for validity. The >> passing through of the root namespace must occur on any non-prefixed >> element in a facelet page. AS> Sounds good. (Sounds like we are just specifying behavior that Faclets = AS> has always implemented, right?) Yes, that is correct. AS> BTW, I see that we still have and components in the = AS> latest spec. I haven't seen an explanation for why this are = AS> necessary/useful. When I asked about this, you mentioned that = AS> was useful as a resource target. However, it is not. From our earlier = AS> thread: >> I see. Unfortunately this approach is flawed. The element may = >> only contain and elements. As such, "html" is not a = >> valid target for resource relocation. We need to remove this new = >> requirement from the 2.1 specification. >> = >> If cannot serve as a resource target and if is a valid = >> element in XML processing mode, I am still unclear on the value of = >> and wonder whether this should be included in the 2.1 = >> specification. >> = >> On a related note, what's up with ? :-) Can we kill this = >> off? Or is there some reason why folks would need to use this instead = >> of ? = AS> I don't remember seeing a response to this, though with all of the = AS> emails lately, I may have missed it. AS> I still do not understand why our users would use <h:html> and <h:title= > = AS> over <html> and <title>. If we don't have a strong reason for why thes= e = AS> components are useful, we should remove these from the specification in = AS> order to avoid spec/component bloat. I will drop <h:html> and <h:title>. Ed -- = | edward.burns(a)oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017 | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/ | 3 work days until German Oracle User's Group Conference | 10 work days until GlassFish 3.1 Hard Code Freeze --===============6535921948348142298==--