On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:24:59 +0200, Martin Marinschek <mmarinschek@APACHE.ORG> said:
            

MM> - A very small thing, but could be very useful: we could define that
MM> the component-tag-handler of the facelets-vdl needs to put the
MM> location of the component into the component-attributes map. With
MM> this, we can emit the location of the component if there is an
MM> exception during any lifecyle-phase - I believe this would help many
MM> application developers. We can do this now (and shouldn't have done
MM> before) cause with partial-state it is not a problem to have this
MM> information in the component attributes map.

Done.
  

AS> Definitely a fan of anything that we can do to improve ease of
AS> debugging.  Regarding full vs partial state saving...  I am thinking
AS> that we may need to save full state in certain cases (eg. if we run into
AS> cases that partial state saving cannot handle correctly).  If we are
AS> concerned about bloating the saved state size with location information
AS> in such cases, one option might be to only store location information
AS> when project stage == development.  Actually, perhaps only storing
AS> location information during the development (or, at least,
AS> non-production) stage might not be a bad idea anyway?
  

a very reasonable idea!

regards,

Martin