Awesome. Thanks Andy.

-Dan

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Andy Schwartz <andy.schwartz@oracle.com> wrote:
Dan Allen wrote:
I'm almost certain that we agreed that the event parameter (and exception signature) were optional. I clearly remember having that discussion. I don't have it in my archives, but for those that have them, the discussion should start around Jan 17, 2009.

I couldn't find the system event listener discussion, but I did find the discussion about making FacesEvents optional.  Was started on 8/13/08 by Pete.  Conditionally closed on 8/23 by Ed.  I won't bother trying to link to the mail archives (sigh), but the spec issue is:

https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=447



Thus, I consider this a spec error. The fact that Mojarra implements the desired behavior is a partial indication that we agreed on it, too.

Yep.  Think we are all in agreement on this now.  The spec issue that I logged is targeted for 2.0 Rev a, so at this point I think it is safe to assume that we'll be fixing this for our MR.

Andy



-Dan

--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen




--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen