Hi Werner -

Thanks for bringing this up. I'll take a look to see how jsdoc is processing these functions.

-roger

On 7/23/10 9:08 AM, Werner Punz wrote:

Hello everyone while checking the jsdocs of 2.0 rev a, I stumbled upon something which does not make too much sense to me: following new definitions:

<inner>

isAutoExec()

<inner>
replaceNode(node, newNode)

Replace one node with another.

Both functions being exposed in the jsdocs but marked as inner functions (which are then not exposed to the outside)
Both do not make any sense in their respective location within jsf.ajax, if they should be jsdocwise exposed they probably would make more sense under jsf.util, and in case of replaceNode I am not entirely convinced if it should be exposed documentationwise at all.

Do not get me wrong both implementations definitely already have implemented both functions otherwise the impls would not work, but why exposing them jsdocwise?

Was this an accident or was there a reason behind it.

Werner

-- 
roger.kitain@oracle.com
https://twitter.com/rogerk09
http://www.java.net/blogs/rogerk

<inner>	isAutoExec()
<inner>	replaceNode(node, newNode) Replace one node with another.