On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Ed Burns <Ed.Burns@sun.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:13:36 -0400, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen@gmail.com> said:

DA> I suppose it depends on whether insertFacet attaches a facet to the parent
DA> component or whether it inserts the contents of the facet inline. I suspect
DA> the latter. In that case, you woud need to wrap insertFacet in <f:facet>,
DA> right?

Hmm, I didn't have the spec with me at the time (future Android app?) and I guessed wrong. Given it's the other way around, then I guess there isn't much other choice than to go with option #1 in the correlated e-mail (targetName attribute on insertFacet).

Personally, I would have preferred it the other way around, where the explicit <f:facet> wrapper in the implementation is required. But I can see how the extra typing would not be well received.

-Dan

--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen