You know, that wasn't nearly as bad as I thought. I found the Spring vs Java EE thread pretty fascinating, actually. I'll have to tell Reza that :-).

I added a small post, but honestly, I felt like JSF 2 was represented pretty well, and not just by us.

Yup, agreed. Quite a few folks were quick to defend JSF 2, and highlight how cool it is. Yet another verification that we're on the right track. Feels good.

david

---
Kito D. Mann | twitter: kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
Virtua, Inc. | http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE training and consulting
http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info | twitter: jsfcentral
+1 203-404-4848 x3

Sign up for the JSFCentral newsletter: http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:47 PM, David Geary <clarity.training@gmail.com> wrote:
I just posted something as well. I think it's important that we publicly acknowledge that JSF 1 left a lot to be desired, but that we are working hard to fix that in JSF 2. I also think it's important that we let people know we are listening, and that we seriously consider what they say, even if they may be somewhat belligerent. I also added a link to www.javaserverfaces.org in my reply.

Great post. Some posts need no response because there would be nothing more to add or take away. I think your post falls in that category ;)

-Dan

--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen