On 11/03/2009 10:05 PM, Dan Allen wrote:

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Martin Marinschek <mmarinschek@apache.org> wrote:

I would hope we take this in. However, we would probably have to
specify a default-name for the FacesServlet then, so that people can
override.

Precisely.

Also, is the postfix-mapping the way to go right now? With resource
handling, prefix mapping might be easier to pre-configure?

I'm fine with either one. I just always use suffix mapping out of habit.

Prefix mapping would be even better. Framework can believe on prefix to load resources that resolves relative references form styles and scripts, but user still can append its own prefixes and suffixes if he wants.
The only problem is portlet environment where Faces Servlet is not necessary and it even had better to not include servlet configuration at all to prevent direct access to JSF pages.

-Dan

--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen