Agreed. I don't know if that's something we can fix? Should be fixed IMO. Though I don't understand the reasons it wasn't included at all, so I can't really theorize.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
From: Dan Allen <dan.j.allen@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:20:53 -0400
To: <lincolnbaxter@gmail.com>; <jsr-314-open@jcp.org>
Subject: Re: [jsr-314-open] [OT] faces-config.xml names
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:16 PM,
<lincolnbaxter@gmail.com> wrote:
Andy,
Prettyfaces uses ocpsoft_pretty_faces (dot is not an allowed character and will cause deploy failure)
Too bad. I would have voted for the Java namespace style. I like org.apache.myfaces.trinidad and org.ocpsoft.prettyfaces
Either way, I would use a name that maps closely to the root package of the component library.
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen