|
--- Lincoln Baxter, III http://ocpsoft.com http://scrumshark.com "Keep it Simple" |
Thanks Roger!
david
2009/12/16 Roger Kitain <Roger.Kitain@sun.com>
I've filed this as "Implicit Resource Relocation":
https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=702
-roger
David Geary wrote:
2009/12/15 Jim Driscoll <Jim.Driscoll@sun.com <mailto:Jim.Driscoll@sun.com>>
Could someone please file this as a spec RFE?
Lincoln?!? You were the last to respond, buddy. :)
david
We'll have to do a performance test to really see the
implications, but it does seem like it would be useful to have this.
Jim
On 12/15/09 12:04 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
I'd even like to see it add <head> if not provided. Would that
be too
overreaching?
Lincoln Baxter III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
Keep it simple.
On Dec 15, 2009 1:02 PM, "David Geary"
<clarity.training@gmail.com
<mailto:clarity.training@gmail.com>
<mailto:clarity.training@gmail.com
<mailto:clarity.training@gmail.com>>> wrote:
2009/12/15 Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter@gmail.com
<mailto:lincolnbaxter@gmail.com>
<mailto:lincolnbaxter@gmail.com
<mailto:lincolnbaxter@gmail.com>>>
> > It would be nice if it "just worked", and jsf would
automatically
add/detect he right place to l...
+1. I always pitch h:head and h:body as necessary to
coordinate with
resource relocation from h:outputScript and
h:outputStylesheet, but it
would be great if you could just use <head> and <body>
instead, and
have everything work.
david
> > Lincoln Baxter III > http://ocpsoft.com >
http://scrumshark.com >
Keep it simple. >> >> On Dec 1...