On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Martin Marinschek <mmarinschek@apache.org> wrote:
Hi guys,

very useful discussion.

I like a) the most, and my +10 for the URN-version for the core taglibs as well. Beautiful!

I think it actually has to be a), so that we are inline with our specifications for the core taglibs, and that we don´t pollute the namespace too much.

The lobbyists have been successful. I switch my vote to (a).
 

I´m sitting right here imaginating there comes the day were I don`t have to tell developers to copy out the header "from some other file".

Exactly! In fact, I just did that tonight! I do that every time I have to create a new XHTML file (without an IDE). I have to search my system for my trust "steal me" template and paste it in. But here, I can do it from memory!

<f:view xmlns:f="jsf:core" xmlns:h="jsf:html">
</f:view>

-Dan

--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://wwwgoogle.com/profiles/dan.j.allen