On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen@gmail.com> wrote:

It appears that you (Ed) opened to door to introducing a new tag, not renaming the existing one. I'm against the rename for reasons cited, but would support the additional <f:clieintBehavior> tag as Andy explained it. However, it wouldn't be a showstopper for me if the extra tag couldn't be added in 2.0.

-Dan

--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan

NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily
basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away
from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more than a week,
it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was
caught in the spam filters.  Please don't hesitate to resend a message if
you feel that it did not reach my attention.