DA> We certainly don't need both jsr-314-eg@jcp.org and
DA> jsr-314-observers@jcp.org.

I don't know about that, but I do know we need jsr-314-eg@jcp.org to be
an EG private email list.  Contractual discussions regarding licenses
and other topics that vendors feel sensitive about discussing openly
need a place to happen.  jsr-314-eg@jcp.org has been and will continue
to be that place.

Thanks for scratching your itch on this Dan.  Your advocacy for
open-ness fits in with the continuing push of JCP to be more open.