Re: [jsr-314-open] Request for Changes
to 2.0 Final Artifact
Sent by:
jsr-314-open-bounces@jcp.org
Sure, +1. And more importantly, welcome to 314
Lincoln! Better late
than never I guess. :-)
Andy
lincolnbaxter@gmail.com wrote:
> + 1
>
> :)
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pete Muir <pmuir@redhat.com>
>
> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:00:52
> To: <jsr-314-open@jcp.org>
> Subject: Re: Request for Changes to 2.0 Final Artifact
>
>
> + 1
>
> On 23 Jun 2009, at 22:52, Roger Kitain wrote:
>
>
>> Hello EG members,
>>
>> We seem to have overlooked the following critical issues in the
>> specification, some of them brought to our attention based on
your
>> feedback.
>>
>> 1148: Numerous bugs in the PDL documentation
>> https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1148
>>
>> 570: Missing description field in javascript event payload
>> https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=570
>>
>> 578: Change javascript payload "name" to "status"
>> https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=578
>>
>> Since the JSF 2.0 final artifacts have not been pushed on the
JCP
>> site yet, we would like to use this opportunity to make these
>> critical changes to the artifacts and then push it to the JCP
>> website. We would like to use this opportunity to fix these
issues
>> so that this is taken into effect in the EE 6 platform spec.
>>
>> More changes from your feedback and our analysis will come in
an MR.
>> Currently proposed changes for this MR can be found here:http://wiki.java.net/bin/view/Projects/Jsf2MR1ChangeLog
>> .
>> The change log is still a work in progress as more issues have
been
>> conveyed by the EG, but have not yet been added to the log.
>>
>> Please confirm within 48 hours that is, close of your business
day,
>> Jun 25th if you approve these 3 changes. Even one vote received
>> against these changes will result in dropping this effort.
>>
>> Thanks you for your understanding.
>> Ed / Roger
>>
>
>