On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Bill Burke <bburke@redhat.com> wrote:


On 2/4/2014 12:38 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>     I've added Keycloak AS7 modules to UPS cart but not admin console. I
>     believe
>     that Keycloak is SaaS, so usage with two different carts reflect
>     reality better.
>     Configuring Keycloak cart once and let all other carts use is seems
>     the right
>     way to me.
>
>
> there is IMO pros and cons in both ways
>

Originally, Keycloak was going to be a SaaS.  One internet service where
users could register and create their own Realms....But, we decided that
users will probably want to have full control of their security metadata
and not share a database with other users.  Less we have to worry about
from a storage security standpoint.

IMO, UPS should support bundling its own keycloak server already
preconfigured, or, it should hook into an existing keycloak instance.


exactly - that also makes the user experience way better, running everything in the cloud, OOTB

-M
 
 I
don't know if this would require 2 different cartridges, or if you would
have an online "installation" UI to make these types of decisions.

--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf