That is - in itself - a problem for an application with works-out-of-the-Box aspirations, yes?
// vänlig hälsning,// [sw: "best regards"],//// Lennart JörelidWhy would we need i18n/l10n for examples? We don't provide internationalization of applications themselves.On 15 September 2015 at 10:02, Boleslaw Dawidowicz <bdawidow@redhat.com> wrote:I would rather keep them simple.
We would consider a single bigger and more complex one - then it would fit.
--
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Stan Silvert <ssilvert@redhat.com> wrote:
> Wondering...
>
> Will we need to do i18n/l10n for the examples?
>
> Do we want to upgrade angular for the examples that us it? Right now,
> they are still using AngularJS 1.2 while the admin console uses 1.4.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
Bolesław Dawidowicz
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev