Ouch … question:

We have 2 nodes cluster to provide failover with user session replication.

Is this workaround needed? If yes, will user session be replicated to second node if first dies?

Thanks,

Libor Krzyžanek
jboss.org Development Team

On 02 Sep 2015, at 14:44, Stian Thorgersen <stian@redhat.com> wrote:

I recently removed the memory user session provider and replaced it with Infinispan local caches. There's an issue with that on EAP though. Infinispan didn't support map reduce tasks on local caches until 5.3 and EAP 6.4 is on 5.2.

As a work around the Infinispan user session provider will fallback to the old deprecated memory user session provider if Infinispan is older than 5.3 and the cache is a local cache. The memory user session provider is not available as a standalone provider, just used internally by the Infinispan user session provider in this particular case.

Once we move to EAP 7 we can remove this work around.
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev