I think reproducing the mentioned issue was easier w that example. Perhaps for you on fixing/testing as well.
But there is IMO no real need for it. Just a convenienceĀ 


On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Stian Thorgersen <stian@redhat.com> wrote:
No strong feelings, just checking if it's actually still in use, so if you still use it we'll keep it ;)

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew@apache.org>
> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian@redhat.com>
> Cc: "keycloak dev" <keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Friday, 11 July, 2014 10:38:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Do we still need project-integrations/aerogear-ups
>
> It helped us to for getting the UPS integration running.
>
> I used it basically as a 'simple way' to describe error, instead of having
> to mess around w/ UPS, as things are reproducable w/ the KC src base (e.g.
> KEYCLOAK-556 );
> But if you have strong feelings around deleting it, go for it
>
> -Matthias
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Can we delete project-integrations/aerogear-ups, or do we still need it?
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf