We're of course up or that.  I'm really happy with what the UXD team is
doing and anything to help out their efforts is great.

On 3/12/2014 8:47 AM, Ken Finnigan wrote:
> All,
>
>  From the work that Viliam and Alex have done on the console for
> Keycloak and now LiveOak, it's become apparent that there are a lot of
> common AngularJS components, that utilize PatternFly styles, which have
> simply been copied from Keycloak to LiveOak.
>
> We've had some discussion with the UXD team and they are interested in
> us commencing an AngularJS components project under the PatternFly
> umbrella, so that Keycloak and LiveOak can utilize the same code without
> replication. It would also benefit future projects that wish to use
> AngularJS and PatternFly.
>
> Bill, do you have any objections about the idea to extract out common
> components into a separate project?
>
> If you're ok with the idea, it would be completely up to the Keycloak
> project as to when it feels is the best time to begin using these
> components so as not to impact current release schedules.
>
> Initially it would be Keycloak and LiveOak driving the project and the
> development of the components, but in time it may grow to additional
> projects.
>
> Let me know your thoughts.
>
> Thanks
> Ken
>
>

> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>

--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev