On 18 August 2016 at 19:26, Bill Burke <bburke@redhat.com> wrote:

On 8/18/16 1:13 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:

One problem with this approach is that you end up having a separate JDBC connection and transaction even if it uses the same database the Keycloak server uses.

Something we have to fix anyways. Its on my todo list.

Take a look at https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/tree/master/examples/providers/domain-extension/src/main/java/org/keycloak/examples/domainextension/jpa for example which allows adding custom entities to the main EntityManager.

I'm really not a big fan of this extension and this is something I do not want to support for product ever.

Why, please elaborate? IMO it's a really nice and simple way to add a few extra entities for custom providers.

Bill