On 12/17/2015 8:47 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
On 17 December 2015 at 14:39, Bill Burke <bburke@redhat.com
<mailto:bburke@redhat.com>> wrote:
I don't think you've thought this through. Of course you would want
scope on a client template.
Client Template allows scope for Service A, Service B, and Service C.
Client 1, Client 2, and Client 3 all need to access Service A, B,
and C. You'd have to define scope in each client when it would be
easier to define it in the client template.
I have thought it through - I just think that it's a lot more likely
that Client 1 will invoke Service A, Client 2 will invoke Service B.
Even if all clients invoke all services they will not have the same
scope, but different scope.
An argument of "I don't think people will use this" is just as valid as my argument that I think people will want to use it. The template would define the scope that is shared between multiple clients, then each client would add their own additional scope for the other services they need to use.